Welcome to symthic forums! We would love if you'd register!
You don't have to be expert in bit baking, everyone is more than welcome to join our community.

You are not logged in.

Hey! If this is your first visit on symthic.com, also check out our weapon damage charts.
Currently we have charts for Battlefield 3, Call of Duty: Black Ops 2, Medal of Honor: Warfighter and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

Posts: 1,211

Date of registration
: Dec 7th 2011

Platform: PC

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 11

  • Send private message

21

Tuesday, May 27th 2014, 9:01pm

Am I the only one who thinks this could be really cool? At least it's not another modern army or ww2 game. :)
bob

Posts: 5,693

Date of registration
: Jul 6th 2012

Platform: PC

Location: Belgium

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 16

  • Send private message

22

Tuesday, May 27th 2014, 9:02pm

That cynicism regarding Battlefield or such games in general is really getting ridicilous...
Problem 1: Really soon after BF4
Problem 2: Not made by DICE
Problem 3: It's not Battlefield

Posts: 482

Date of registration
: Feb 17th 2014

Platform: 360

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 2

  • Send private message

23

Tuesday, May 27th 2014, 9:07pm

Doesn't matter, little heli + minigun confirmed.

Yeah but stingers...WHY DICE? Obviously pilots like you won't find them an issue, but they sure as hell don't need to be in the game.

When will people learn the power of a skillfully aimed RPG?

But yeah, the fact there's a stinger in a police "Battlefield" bothers me five times more than the fact theres a "battlefield" being made by a developer other than DICE.

  • "Azaí" started this thread

Posts: 205

Date of registration
: May 10th 2014

Platform: PC

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 2

  • Send private message

24

Tuesday, May 27th 2014, 9:09pm

That cynicism regarding Battlefield or such games in general is really getting ridicilous...
Problem 1: Really soon after BF4
Problem 2: Not made by DICE
Problem 3: It's not Battlefield
1: Its not made by Dice and EA always released a Fall Shooter. It was MoH before, now its Viscerals Shooter.
2: So what? its a shitty game instantly?! cause DICE is the only good developer? Visceral heavily assisted BF3 and also made BF3 DLCs
3: You judge a game just by its name? 8|

Posts: 3,257

Date of registration
: Apr 26th 2013

Platform: PS4

Location: Arizona, USA

Reputation modifier: 15

  • Send private message

25

Tuesday, May 27th 2014, 9:32pm

That cynicism regarding Battlefield or such games in general is really getting ridicilous...
Problem 1: Really soon after BF4
Problem 2: Not made by DICE
Problem 3: It's not Battlefield
1: Its not made by Dice and EA always released a Fall Shooter. It was MoH before, now its Viscerals Shooter.
2: So what? its a shitty game instantly?! cause DICE is the only good developer? Visceral heavily assisted BF3 and also made BF3 DLCs
3: You judge a game just by its name? 8|

First off, your response is disrespectful. Not to a Moderator, but to anyone. Second, what he was referring to in point number 2 was that it cannot truly be a Battlefield game if DICE is not the Developer. Medal of Honor: Warfighter wasn't dubbed Battlefield: Warfighter because Danger Close composed the game, not DICE. So by that logic, Hardline should not be labeled as "Battlefield" if DICE is not the lead Developer. Third, point 3 was an emphasis on point 2.
To Aim Assist or not to Aim Assist, that is the question.

Nope. Aim Assist or bust; here's why:

Default Aim Assist Data

Source code

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
AccelerationInputThreshold 0.98
    AccelerationMultiplier 5.0
    AccelerationDamping 4.0
    AccelerationTimeThreshold 0.15
    SquaredAcceleration 0.0
    MaxAcceleration::Vec2
        x 2.0
        y 2.0
    YawSpeedStrength 1.0
    PitchSpeedStrength 1.0
    AttractDistanceFallOffs::Vec2
        x 1.0
        y 1.2
    AttractSoftZone 0.75
    AttractUserInputMultiplier 0.45
    AttractUserInputMultiplier_NoZoom 0.5
    AttractOwnSpeedInfluence 0.0
    AttractTargetSpeedInfluence 0.85
    AttractOwnRequiredMovementForMaximumAttract 0.0
    AttractStartInputThreshold 0.1
    AttractMoveInputCap 0.0
    AttractYawStrength 1.0
    AttractPitchStrength 0.34
    MaxToTargetAngle 45.0
    MaxToTargetXZAngle 45.0
    ViewObstructedKeepTime 0.0
    SnapZoomLateralSpeedLimit 1000.0
    SnapZoomTime 0.2
    SnapZoomPostTimeNoInput 0.2
    SnapZoomPostTime 0.2
    SnapZoomReticlePointPriority 999
    SnapZoomAutoEngageTime 0.0
    SnapZoomBreakTimeAtMaxInput 0.2
    SnapZoomBreakMaxInput 0.2
    SnapZoomBreakMinAngle 90.0
    SnapZoomSpamGuardTime 1.2
    SoldierBackupSkeletonCollisionData *nullGuid*
    CheckBoneCenterOnlyDistance 40.0

No Slowdown Data

Source code

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
AccelerationInputThreshold 0.98
    AccelerationMultiplier 5.0
    AccelerationDamping 4.0
    AccelerationTimeThreshold 0.15
    SquaredAcceleration 0.0
    MaxAcceleration::Vec2
        x 2.0
        y 2.0
    YawSpeedStrength 1.0
    PitchSpeedStrength 1.0
    AttractDistanceFallOffs::Vec2
        x 1.0
        y 1.2
    AttractSoftZone 0.0
    AttractUserInputMultiplier 1.0
    AttractUserInputMultiplier_NoZoom -1.0
    AttractOwnSpeedInfluence 0.0
    AttractTargetSpeedInfluence 0.0
    AttractOwnRequiredMovementForMaximumAttract 0.0
    AttractStartInputThreshold 0.0
    AttractMoveInputCap 0.0
    AttractYawStrength 0.0
    AttractPitchStrength 0.0
    MaxToTargetAngle 45.0
    MaxToTargetXZAngle 45.0
    ViewObstructedKeepTime 0.0
    SnapZoomLateralSpeedLimit 1000.0
    SnapZoomTime 0.2
    SnapZoomPostTimeNoInput 0.0
    SnapZoomPostTime 0.0
    SnapZoomReticlePointPriority 999
    SnapZoomAutoEngageTime 0.0
    SnapZoomBreakTimeAtMaxInput -1.0
    SnapZoomBreakMaxInput 0.2
    SnapZoomBreakMinAngle 90.0
    SnapZoomSpamGuardTime 0.5
    SoldierBackupSkeletonCollisionData *nullGuid*
    CheckBoneCenterOnlyDistance 40.0
    DisableForcedTargetRecalcDistance 7.0


No Auto Rotation Data

Source code

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
 AccelerationInputThreshold 0.98
    AccelerationMultiplier 5.0
    AccelerationDamping 4.0
    AccelerationTimeThreshold 0.15
    SquaredAcceleration 0.0
    MaxAcceleration::Vec2
        x 2.0
        y 2.0
    YawSpeedStrength 1.0
    PitchSpeedStrength 1.0
    AttractDistanceFallOffs::Vec2
        x 1.0
        y 1.2
    AttractSoftZone 0.75
    AttractUserInputMultiplier 0.45
    AttractUserInputMultiplier_NoZoom 0.5
    AttractOwnSpeedInfluence 0.0
    AttractTargetSpeedInfluence 0.85
    AttractOwnRequiredMovementForMaximumAttract 0.0
    AttractStartInputThreshold 0.1
    AttractMoveInputCap 0.0
    AttractYawStrength 1.0
    AttractPitchStrength 0.34
    MaxToTargetAngle 45.0
    MaxToTargetXZAngle 45.0
    ViewObstructedKeepTime 0.0
    SnapZoomLateralSpeedLimit 1000.0
    SnapZoomTime 0.2
    SnapZoomPostTimeNoInput 0.0
    SnapZoomPostTime 0.0
    SnapZoomReticlePointPriority 999
    SnapZoomAutoEngageTime 0.0
    SnapZoomBreakTimeAtMaxInput -1.0
    SnapZoomBreakMaxInput 0.2
    SnapZoomBreakMinAngle 90.0
    SnapZoomSpamGuardTime 0.5
    SoldierBackupSkeletonCollisionData *nullGuid*
    CheckBoneCenterOnlyDistance 40.0
    DisableForcedTargetRecalcDistance 7.0

Prepare your laughbox

the Sebstalder is quiet good since it can 3hit kill at any distanc ,but In my opinion i actually thikn the sweeper is better, its got a really really fast firerate that can beat alll those Noobmaticos, Helregall adn shitguns in close quarters , and its also really accurate out to like l;ong range,. overall great allround gun, jsut my 2$ tho


  • "Azaí" started this thread

Posts: 205

Date of registration
: May 10th 2014

Platform: PC

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 2

  • Send private message

26

Tuesday, May 27th 2014, 9:34pm

That cynicism regarding Battlefield or such games in general is really getting ridicilous...
Problem 1: Really soon after BF4
Problem 2: Not made by DICE
Problem 3: It's not Battlefield
1: Its not made by Dice and EA always released a Fall Shooter. It was MoH before, now its Viscerals Shooter.
2: So what? its a shitty game instantly?! cause DICE is the only good developer? Visceral heavily assisted BF3 BF4 and also made BF3 DLCs
3: You judge a game just by its name? 8|

First off, your response is disrespectful. Not to a Moderator, but to anyone. Second, what he was referring to in point number 2 was that it cannot truly be a Battlefield game if DICE is not the Developer. Medal of Honor: Warfighter wasn't dubbed Battlefield: Warfighter because Danger Close composed the game, not DICE. So by that logic, it should not be labeled as "Battlefield" if DICE is not the lead Developer. Third, point 3 was an emphasis on point 2.
Where was it disrespectful?! Srsly, where?
And my point still stands. Its ridicilous to judge the game by the Title it has...

Posts: 568

Date of registration
: Sep 5th 2013

Platform: PC

Location: Trentino, Italy

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 3

  • Send private message

27

Tuesday, May 27th 2014, 9:53pm

@JSlice20 Not sure where you found all the disrespect...
COD is still COD even if three different developers work on a new installment every year, why shoulodn't Battlefield be similar? More importantly, why shouldn't it be called Battlefield? From the looks of it it seems fairly similar to the existing Battlefield titles, with vehicles, classes, gadgets and stuff. Just because someone else is in charge of developing it doesn't mean it will be a complete disaster or that it will "ruin" the franchise. (speaking of which, BF3 & 4 changed pretty radically compared to the previous titles, but no one complained about them still being Battlefield games).
In the end though it's still too early to throw around predictions and all, and i agree with @Azaí on that.
Clean signature best signature

  • "Azaí" started this thread

Posts: 205

Date of registration
: May 10th 2014

Platform: PC

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 2

  • Send private message

28

Tuesday, May 27th 2014, 10:00pm

And tbh, if the game would be a new IP, people would call it a police themed Batttlefield rip-off.
So whatever name it gets, there will always be something people would complain about.

elementofprgress

Wizard moderator

(3,544)

Posts: 1,619

Date of registration
: Jun 28th 2012

Platform: PC

Location: RI, USA

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 14

  • Send private message

29

Tuesday, May 27th 2014, 10:03pm

my theory. the game is gonna be EA reach to the comp scene. As in fewer explosives, smaller number games, less of the fun randomness in everything, etc, etc. Totally just a theory with zero evidence.

Symthic Forum Rules
Battlefield Data Browser
Come join us on teamspeak!!!
Symthic/Team Symthic Teamspeak: TeamSym.Nitrado.net

  • "Azaí" started this thread

Posts: 205

Date of registration
: May 10th 2014

Platform: PC

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 2

  • Send private message

30

Tuesday, May 27th 2014, 10:06pm

my theory. the game is gonna be EA reach to the comp scene. As in fewer explosives, smaller number games, less of the fun randomness in everything, etc, etc. Totally just a theory with zero evidence.
Which would be awesome if you ask me.

Similar threads