Welcome to symthic forums! We would love if you'd register!
You don't have to be expert in bit baking, everyone is more than welcome to join our community.

You are not logged in.

ease of use vs statistically better setups

Hey! If this is your first visit on symthic.com, also check out our weapon damage charts.
Currently we have charts for Battlefield 3, Call of Duty: Black Ops 2, Medal of Honor: Warfighter and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

youngGod16

Back from the Grave

(1)

  • "youngGod16" started this thread

Posts: 92

Date of registration
: Sep 3rd 2016

Platform: PS4

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 1

  • Send private message

1

Thursday, May 11th 2017, 12:00pm

ease of use vs statistically better setups

VERY simple question
TOP PROS (example MEYEK, JJIKA, RELAA, 2EASY, UNFIXED) in the beginning used setups that were very easy to use over statistically better setups.
is this because statistically better setups (ex. ace with stubby/stubby-hb) have a very smallish advantage over ease of use setups (ex. ace/scar with angled-comp/angled-mb) ?
or is because 90% or so of competitive matches were headglitching making muzzlebrake and easier setups the way to go.......
hmmmmmmmmmm


example - MEYEK destroyed his compitition with ergo/mb on the ace 23 and those are two attachments you wouldnt recommend statistically regardless of his playstyle. he still prefer that setup to this day but sometimes prefers to run it without the MB.

BleedingUranium

Salt Miner

(3,289)

Posts: 3,674

Date of registration
: Mar 19th 2014

Platform: Xbox One

Location: Canada

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 16

  • Send private message

2

Thursday, May 11th 2017, 9:36pm

Whatever works best and gives the best result for you is the best setup for you. This is true for plenty of fields outside of weapon selection in video games.
Who Enjoys, Wins

Similar threads