Welcome to symthic forums! We would love if you'd register!
You don't have to be expert in bit baking, everyone is more than welcome to join our community.

You are not logged in.

Hey! If this is your first visit on symthic.com, also check out our weapon damage charts.
Currently we have charts for Battlefield 3, Call of Duty: Black Ops 2, Medal of Honor: Warfighter and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

  • "KMRblue1027" started this thread

Posts: 253

Date of registration
: Jan 15th 2014

Platform: PS4

Location: NJ

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 5

  • Send private message

1

Tuesday, February 18th 2014, 7:20am

Passive Radar and Lock-On Balance

I know I'm probably in the minority opinion here that I think the current air vs ground balance is actually well done in BF4 in its current state, but it seems to me that the current crop of lock-on missiles strongly favors the fire and forget types (Stringer, heatseakers, active radar, ect.) while the IGLA and Passive Radar kinda are left to sorta just exist. They are supposed to have a range buff in comparison to their counterparts but instead they can be simply outrun while a Stinger or heatseaker will follow you well outside an IGLA's range. Ultimately this leaves them fairly useless in the grand scheme of things and I've been trying to fugue out how to balance them. Maybe a speed buff while the other types get range nerfs?

Posts: 486

Date of registration
: Apr 2nd 2013

Platform: Xbox One

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 7

  • Send private message

2

Tuesday, February 18th 2014, 7:32am

I personally would have them function as "sniper" missiles where their range justifies holding the lock, like 1000+m. Their drawback would be the time it takes for the missile to get to its target, so that it would be easily defeated by CM's given its travel speed.

Posts: 206

Date of registration
: Apr 5th 2012

Platform: PS4

Location: Here

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 8

  • Send private message

3

Tuesday, February 18th 2014, 7:23pm

The IGLA was king on certain maps before they changed the ability to relock while firing a second missile (aka the wambo combo). you could simply fire the first, and if they flared just reload and fire the second with both hitting. The downfall was that you were a sitting duck for ~10 seconds. Now that this is not possible they definitely need a rebalance to make the IGLA a viable choice over the Stinger. I would actually like to see the Stinger lock time increased and a possible minor damage buff for the IGLA.

Posts: 199

Date of registration
: Nov 12th 2013

Platform: PC

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 3

  • Send private message

4

Thursday, February 27th 2014, 11:46pm

i think the sniper missile idea has a lot of merit for the passive radar/igla, especially if it can still regain locks after flaring. this is also more in line with how these weapons tend to work in actual engagements (thinking here of the sparrow-type AIM missiles specifically). either that or a pretty big damage buff for the passive weapons seems in line. i'd be happy with both, really; it'd be nice to have an air-to-air missile that could actually do something against another plane for once.

Posts: 1,000

Date of registration
: Nov 5th 2013

Platform: PC

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 6

  • Send private message

5

Friday, February 28th 2014, 12:05am

The IGLA does have slight higher range and faster time to target overall. The safest way to rebalance these two would be to make the stinger deal less damage. Instead of 225, it should probably be lowered to 150. That would up its number of required missiles for a disable and destroy on helicopters (cept the transport) and jets from 2 to 3 and 3 to 4 respectively.

Another option is reducing the missile acceleration, speed and min turn radius so that it can be dodged more easily. There was a post about rebalancing AA missiles as a whole by Labby which addressed the missile flight aspects in more detail but I don't have it handy
This is where I'm coming from: Clicky

Posts: 32

Date of registration
: Apr 1st 2016

Platform: PC

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 1

  • Send private message

6

Monday, April 4th 2016, 5:35am

With the current balance the Passive Radar Missile is an effective weapon. Though it's capabilities are not often understood or exploited. Even by good pilots.

Passive Radar can be equipped on Stealth Jet and MAA. It is also the only AA option available to the Attack Boat. The advantage of this missile lies in it's capability to release missile prior to acquiring lock. The advantage here is that you can release your missiles at an incoming air target, without any lock tone alerting your opponent. Then, as the missiles are getting close to your target, you aquire lock, and your missiles will instantly veer into the target. With correct timing, if your target doesn't pre-emptively ECM, or Flare, they will have milliseconds to react.

The reason why this catches pilots off guard is that you are giving them an acquiring tone. Which most pilots associate with heat seeker type missiles. They expect the missile to be released after lock. Little do they realise that your missiles have already been released, and they are in imminent danger... So they are expecting acquiring tone, locked tone, and then critical tone - and most pilots only flare after critical tone. Because, to do otherwise would result in a full missile hit after their countermeasures are exhausted.

But with a Passive Radar, released prior to lock, the tone goes straight from acquiring tone, to critical tone. With missile impact immediately after (when properly timed). The correct time to deploy countermeasures is during the acquiring lock tone. Which forces pilots to flare earlier, and makes them more vulnerable. Even if they do flare, after lock, the Passive Radar when locked move at such high velocity that there is high probability of a "dumb-fire hit".

With a typical rate of closure on a fairly static target (such as a Helicopter) the correct release timing is at 830 distance. Lock begins acquiring at 650 distance when you should start throttling back, and is acquired at 600 or 550. This will usually give an outright kill at 600 distance, or a 78 HP heavy mobility hit. Which gives plenty of air time to finish the target with a gun attack. Being able to make kills at 600 distance, most players can't even see you - and for those with Air Radar, you will only be appearing on screen briefly. Most pilots can't effectively react in this time.

For other targets with higher rates of closer missile release should happen at a distance of 960. When you are on the tail of a jet at full speed, and in pursuit with afterburner. I would recommend missile release at about 700 distance, then switching to guns (so you don't alert your opponent). Then switch to missile lock when you can see that the missiles are near your target.

I have some experience with using Passive Radar. These things are lethal now. The advantage of Passive over Active is that, when used properly, they can give less critical tone time, and hit faster.

This post has been edited 5 times, last edit by "Benjamin" (Apr 4th 2016, 5:55am)


Posts: 116

Date of registration
: Dec 26th 2015

Platform: PC

Reputation modifier: 3

  • Send private message

7

Monday, April 4th 2016, 7:02am

I have some experience with using Passive Radar. These things are lethal now. The advantage of Passive over Active is that, when used properly, they can give less critical tone time, and hit faster.
This is precisely why I switched from using Heatseekers/Active radar to Passive Radar. In a MAA it makes you a static target for a short period of time, especially when timing the launch properly. It also increases the airborne area in which the MAA can effectively control. Heck, you can fire the missiles above helicopters, drive a little, lock on and watch as you get the mobility kill. It's immensely gratifying.
I love the math behind the statistics
It's possible to find me online at almost any given time, due to the fact that my schedule is hectic and rather non-existent.

Who needs sleep anyways?
(PC/PS4 gamer)

Various bf4 spreadsheets: (nothing special, just raw data from the Symthic website put into a spreadsheet to analyze all values at once)

Spoiler Spoiler


General Weapon spreadsheet:
BF4_Weapons_enhanced_UPDATED_2016
Soldier Equipment:
BF4_Gadget_Damage
Interactive Damage Table
bf4_dmg_at_range - Google Sheets
Unsuppressed Sniper Rifle Bullet Drop Charts
bf4_sniper_guide
Suppressed Sniper Rifle Bullet Drop Charts
Suppressed bf4_sniper_guide
More user friendly Unsuppressed Sniper Rifle Bullet Drop Chart
Friendlier Sniper rifle Bullet Drop Chart
More user friendly Suppressed Sniper Rifle Bullet Drop Chart
Friendlier Suppressed Sniper Rifle Bullet Drop Chart

Miffyli

Symthic Developer

(6,611)

Posts: 3,721

Date of registration
: Mar 21st 2013

Platform: PC

Location: __main__, Finland

Reputation modifier: 17

  • Send private message

8

Monday, April 4th 2016, 7:14am

@Benjamin
While that was very ontopic and well written, avoid posting on topics that have been inactive for few months, let alone over a year. (Rule 11)

Topic locked.
Links to users' thread list who have made analytical/statistical/mathematical/cool posts on Symthic:
  • 3VerstsNorth - Analysis of game mechanics in BF4 (tickrates, effects of tickrate, etc)
  • leptis - Analysis of shotguns, recoil, recoil control and air drag.
  • Veritable - Scoring of BF4/BF1 firearms in terms of usability, firing and other mechanics.
  • Miffyli - Random statistical analysis of BF4 battlereports/players and kill-distances. (list is cluttered with other threads).
Sorry if your name wasn't on the list, I honestly can't recall all names : ( . Nudge me if you want to be included