Welcome to symthic forums! We would love if you'd register!
You don't have to be expert in bit baking, everyone is more than welcome to join our community.

You are not logged in.

Hey! If this is your first visit on symthic.com, also check out our weapon damage charts.
Currently we have charts for Battlefield 3, Call of Duty: Black Ops 2, Medal of Honor: Warfighter and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

Labby

Moderator

(3,416)

  • "Labby" started this thread

Posts: 1,585

Date of registration
: Sep 26th 2012

Platform: PC

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 11

  • Send private message

1

Friday, January 10th 2014, 5:32pm

A Symthic Community Response to Demize99's Feedback Request

This is a response to Demize99's request for balance feedback collated from from posts around the forums and extensive discussion with respected members.

Quoted from "Alan Kertz @Demize99"

The Scout cannon tweak is because they are better at all targets than the miniguns. They are designed to be a weak anti vehicle option.

  • The 25mm cannons already fulfil the weak anti-vehicle role, 30 rear shots on an MBT are already capable of taking up to 70% of the tankís health, they do not need higher direct damage. Even a slight increase in damage would allow the 25mm to disable or kill a tank in a single pass. As for effectiveness against infantry, higher direct damage would make them even more potent, even with reduced splash, as direct hits already make up the bulk of the 25mmís damage since they inflict ~39% each, compared to a mere 14% for splash hits. If you want to make the 25mm less effective against infantry, it should be done either by reducing the direct hit multiplier on infantry from 2.5x to 1x, making direct hits inflict ~24% each instead of 39%, and/or by increasing the cannonís min-spread from zero to 0.5 or 1.0 lowering the probability of scoring direct hits on infantry. Either change would make the 25mm less effective against infantry while having no or minimal effect on its effectiveness against vehicles which is already reasonable.

Quoted from "Alan Kertz @Demize99"

Ok, so that's a pretty resounding "the AH needs survival not firepower." The flip from missile impact is not intentional, so...

  • Missiles causing flips is from the high impulse impact, a reduction in that would solve it.
  • It is very possible to avoid being flipped via correct positioning in respect to the missile impact already, but this isnít widely known.
    How to be a better transport pilot: Pilot Episode - YouTube - at 10:18-10-32 countering missile flips is described .
  • Being instantly flipped without ability to recover because you lack this knowledge generally isnít the most entertaining thing. Reducing the impulse to a slight push will still give skilled pilots the edge in dealing with missiles.
  • Survival is the serious issue, currently countermeasures take so long to reload that after countermeasure use, a single opposing infantryman can fire all of the stingers he can carry, killing the heli twice over, a reduction in reload to 17s for ECM and 14s for Flares allows a single stinger source to hit the helicopter with 2 missiles at 300m, causing a disable and Forcing the heli to land and repair.
  • Missile agility seems to cause lots of hits through countermeasures, Missile max turn angle is 3600 for most missiles, 6000 for active radar, causing them to turn into the vehicle, unlike in BF3, where countermeasures would force the missiles into wide loops around the vehicles. Seriously cutting the max turn angle will significantly decrease the incidents where countermeasures ďfailĒ, one of the largest helicopter and aircraft complaints at the moment.

Quoted from "Alan Kertz @Demize99"

Ok, pretty clear people think the MAA range on their gun is an issue. Will take a look.

  • Max range of the MAAís gun is not the issue. Shortening the max range of the MAAís gun will simply allow aircraft to attack from outside its range. The attack heliís TV missiles already outrange the MAAís 30mm. If you wish to reduce the gunís effectiveness at range it should be done by increasing max spread from 0.6 to 1.0. This would cause the MAA to land fewer hits as targets get farther away, effectively reducing its DPS against distant targets without completely removing itís ability to hit targets at range. Annoy: yes; seriously hurt: no

Quoted from "Alan Kertz @Demize99"

Attack Heli Gunner: Higher Direct DMG
Scout 25mm: Lower splash damage, Higher Direct DMG: aka more anti vehicle and less anti infantry.

  • See first response.

Quoted from "Alan Kertz @Demize99"

MAA: 4 missiles instead of 6 missiles
Attack Heli:
-Higher ROF on rockets
-Zuni higher direct damage
-Rocket splash radius up
Thoughts?

  • The four missiles instead of six for MAA sounds good. The reserve ammo counter should be made consistent with other vehicle weapons as well. Currently it seems to count magazines rather than missiles.
  • The effectiveness of the attack heliís weapons is actually in a pretty good place where it is now. The problem is survivability
  • Damage on Hydras and Zunis is good. Smart rockets are simply way too slow.
  • Properly aimed Zuni rockets kill an MBT in a single magazine, a slight improvement to direct damage would allow more leeway on the aiming require to achieve this, whilst also improving zuni performance vs other facings, to better compete vs hydras against heavy armour.

Quoted from "Alan Kertz @Demize99"

I think the V40 is a bigger issue in Hardcore than Core. Agree?

  • You canít balance around 60 and 100 hitpoints at the same time. The V40's issue is the large inner splash radius. You often can not take effective cover. Reducing inner splash radius from 4m to 2m will make them less effective at mindless throwing.

Quoted from "Alan Kertz @Demize99"

NLAW, Active Radar, STAFF pic.twitter.com/9I5ouhz4VZ

  • Active radar accelerates extremely quickly (and the jet version has very high velocity), making them somewhat easy to aim. A reduction in active radar missile acceleration and maximum velocity would make them less ďsmartĒ via requiring more active prediction from the user. The targeted vehicle would also get a longer warning time.
  • NLAW and STAFF can lock on through obstacles, making the use of cover less rewarding.
  • STAFF and NLAW have very short locking range, but large acceptance angles. Doing what you did to active radar shortly after release (longer lock range, smaller angle) would increase the aiming requirements. We suggest something on the order of 100 m raylength and 3 degree acceptance angle. This change would require the user to be more accurate to score hits, provide a longer lock warning allowing the target to use IR smoke, and would give the NLAW and STAFF shell a niche at longer ranges.
  • Being hit almost immediately after the warning is the major complaint about active radar and NLAW/STAFF, some users reporting that by the time they hear the warning, they've already been hit. The above suggestions also solve this issue.
JOIN THE TEAMSPEAK (L)EVOLUTION: 162.208.89.103


DO A BARREL ROLL!

This post has been edited 2 times, last edit by "Labby" (Jan 10th 2014, 8:19pm)


Posts: 319

Date of registration
: Feb 4th 2013

Platform: Xbox One

Location: The Netherlands

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 3

  • Send private message

2

Friday, January 10th 2014, 5:37pm

Very nice. Great job. :)

Rezal

Listen to Rezal!

(5,222)

Posts: 2,884

Date of registration
: Apr 6th 2012

Platform: PC

Location: From the heart of Europe.

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 13

  • Send private message

3

Friday, January 10th 2014, 5:43pm

This sounds like good ideas to improve vehicle gameplay.
Regen or GTFO.

Quoted from "CTE Scrub"

I mean the clearest example of this in Battlefield 4 is the mathematical fact that the FAMAS is putting out 40% higher DPS than the slowest AR the SAR-21, making it the choice when it comes to close combat. It shouldn't be that way.


Posts: 14

Date of registration
: Aug 16th 2013

Platform: PC

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 2

  • Send private message

4

Friday, January 10th 2014, 5:48pm

Hopefully this is seen and taken seriously. I really don't want to see nerfs and buffs because people are complaining without any stats to backup.

ToTheSun!

something cooler

(3,481)

Posts: 6,074

Date of registration
: Mar 9th 2012

Platform: PC

Location: Portugal

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 16

  • Send private message

5

Friday, January 10th 2014, 5:51pm

Best balance write-up i've seen for BF4. I hope this gets implemented!

Posts: 3,544

Date of registration
: Feb 25th 2012

Platform: PC

Location: italy... unfortunately.

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 9

  • Send private message

6

Friday, January 10th 2014, 5:58pm

well,now the only hope left is that they can buff dmrs without being contraditory(aka please god don't make them buff their damage to 50+)
"I'm just a loot whore."


stuff not related to BF4 that interests nobody



on 27/09/2014
29(30)th DMR user in italy(07/04/14)
rush mode score RANK:3617 TOP:1% OUT OF:387719
obliteration mode scoreRANK:2080 TOP:1% OUT OF:292522
longest headshot RANK:9790 TOP:2% OUT OF:566292
recon score RANK:8838 TOP:2% OUT OF:492566
score per minute RANK:17554 TOP:3% OUT OF:457583
handgun medals RANK:4534 TOP:3% OUT OF:220970


31/3/2012 4:58:

Headshot distance RANK:493* TOP:0%
Revives per assault minute RANK: 6019 TOP: 3%
Headshots / kill percentage RANK:25947 TOP:13%
MVP ribbons RANK:18824 TOP:11%

*= 6 if we not count the EOD BOT headshots

@kataklism

ARGUMENT DESTROYED 100

ENEMY KILLED [REASON] JSLICE20 100


WRITING SPREE STOPPED 500






Cloon

altered his username

(728)

Posts: 516

Date of registration
: Feb 22nd 2012

Platform: PC

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 7

  • Send private message

7

Friday, January 10th 2014, 5:59pm

There are some very good suggestions in this post. Mainly the countermeasure reload times and missile agility suggestions would improve the game very much.

Personally i dont think the MAA maingun changes are needed. Only the 20mm gun has a high range and it already comes with a weakness against armor and infantry compared to the 30mm. Changing its maxspread to 1.0 from 0.6 would allow aircraft to be exposed to MAA fire for more than 10 seconds at range wich is too much. The MAA would become too weak against jets otherwise and borderline useless against infantry at all ranges. The changes to active radar missiles are warranted and good enough to weaken the MAAs potential at range.
I am part of that power which would the evil ever do and ever does the good.





Are you a Symthican and a PC BF3 player?


A catfish has appeared!

Help represent Symthic on the battlefield.
Join Team Symthic!


"If it revolves around DICE physics...i will find a way to abuse it in some ridiculous manor, that you can count on" - elementofprgress

C0llis

Up and down. Bounce all around

(924)

Posts: 2,080

Date of registration
: Apr 15th 2013

Platform: PC

Location: Sweden

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 8

  • Send private message

8

Friday, January 10th 2014, 6:24pm

Excellent write-up. I agree with the points and suggestions, this could really improve vehicle gameplay.

Things people said

And reading Youtube comments still gives me Turbo Cancer.

It really is quite frustrating when Helen Keller sets up her LMG in the only doorway in/out of an area.

What kind of question is that? Since when is cheese ever a bad idea?


ViperFTW

Suidae cathexis

(1,962)

Posts: 7,557

Date of registration
: Jul 1st 2012

Platform: PC

Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom (He's from The North!)

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 15

  • Send private message

9

Friday, January 10th 2014, 6:31pm

This sounds like good ideas to improve vehicle gameplay.


Exactly!
Pretty damn good write up Labby! God for it :)

Everybody's Favourite Useless Support and LMG Fan! :thumbsup:



Steam - Battlefield 3 M60 Guide! - Youtube
Psst! Wanna hear a good song? Crystalic - Lila Ruined

1-WHO-1

Steadiest Stick in the Sky

(57)

Posts: 46

Date of registration
: Mar 6th 2013

Platform: PC

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 3

  • Send private message

10

Friday, January 10th 2014, 6:33pm

@labby

I imagine you solo in the scout heli from time to time and still do well? I specifically solo for competitive practice. Anyway, my point is, I still do very well when I solo in the scout heli, which leads me to beleive the AH's problems are mainly its maneuverability since all the other external factors would mostly be the same (lock times, etc). It would be nice to have a decreased cool down for CM and lower missile agility, but my personal experience says the absolute #1 thing the AH needs is maneuverability. Plus, this kind of change only increases the vehicle's effective "ceiling", while not adjusting the vehicles effective "floor".
- Don't be a Mini-bob