Welcome to symthic forums! We would love if you'd register!
You don't have to be expert in bit baking, everyone is more than welcome to join our community.

You are not logged in.

Hey! If this is your first visit on symthic.com, also check out our weapon damage charts.
Currently we have charts for Battlefield 3, Call of Duty: Black Ops 2, Medal of Honor: Warfighter and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

Can't get a title

Posts: 1,530

Date of registration
: Dec 23rd 2013

Platform: Xbox One

Location: The Land of Multitudinous Kangaroos

Reputation modifier: 12

Tuesday, May 5th 2015, 1:51pm

No PS3 people either? I think ARE5R06, AmmuNOPE and I are possibly the only ones.
something something Model 8 bestgun

### Quoted from "Pastafarianism"

Next, wanna try adding a guy that you KNOW is bad, and just testing to see that? Example: PP-2000 (god I so wanna love this gun, and yet...)

### Quoted from "Pastafarianism"

Example: PP-2000 (god I so wanna love this gun, and yet...)

Yes, it comes in last so far, but that is mostly because I'm making it shoot at 100m ADS - Not Moving as one of the criteria. Even then, between 50-100m Not Moving, when you include Useability, it is only 1.37% worse than the MTAR-21. Within 50m then it even beats the A-91.

Have a look, vs. the A-91 Carbine:

Using it with Muzzle Brake and Compensator is a wash in terms of overall performance. Comp is SLIGHTLY more accurate, while MB is SLIGHTLY more easy to use. Their overall scores are basically tied, with MB just ahead. I guess either can be recommended.

### Quoted from "Pastafarianism"

But... You can't be counting for the fact that it takes 9 bullets to kill at "long" range... Don't you dare tell me my A-91 is worse than a 9 BTK 650 RPM mediocre PDW.

Also. Just go heavy barrel. The recoil is low enough.

### Quoted from "Zer0Cod3x"

Well, technically...

Comparing a PP2K with HB and an A-91 with comp and stubby (as you suggested in an earlier post), at 50m not moving, the A-91 is only better by 4 damage per hitrate. While at 75m and 100m, surprisingly the PP2K does better than the A-91 (I'm pretty damn surprised as well).

And 10m and 50m moving the PP2K also does more damage per hitrate than the A-91. At 25m the A-91 is only better by about half a bullet's damage as well.

In addition, the PP2K has a much larger mag size and substantially less recoil. And it looks hella awesome. So comparing the A-91 to a PDW is of some worth after all, as the PP2K is better (technically, not practically) than the A-91.

Mind blown.

### Quoted from "Pastafarianism"

I... I...

*cries in a corner*

### Quoted from "Veritable"

Zer0Cod3x explained it very well. If you look at the raw numbers right here on Symthic Comparison, you can see how that happened:

A-91 vs PP-2000 | BF4 Weapon Comparison | Symthic

A-91's "23%" RPM advantage only afforded it 1 extra round.

Velocities are wash.

V-Recoil are wash (and this is HBar on PP2k vs. A-91 without).

Hipfire and ADS - Moving are better on the PP2k, but it's a PDW and not the surprising part.

The surprising part is that, as equipped (and we see above that PP2k HBar has almost same V-Recoil as A-91 without HBar so why not?), the PDW performs better at 50 - 100m than a bloody Carbine. Why?

SIPS, 42% better on the PP2k.

And here is the most important part. ADS - Not Moving Spread, 0.35 vs. 0.2, 43% improvement.

Without HBar then of course the PP2k loses, which is why when I add all the attachments together for an Overall Ranking, it would slot below the A-91. Run HBar on it, though, then... I'm sorry

### Quoted from "Pastafarianism"

@Veritable
@Zer0Cod3x
I... I...
But...
Wha...
I AM HAVING AN EXISTENTIAL CRISIS IN SCHOOL BECAUSE OF YOU TWO.

FUCK YOU NERDS AND YOUR FANCY NUMBERS

SEXY RUSSIAN BULLPUPS FTW.

In all seriousness, thank you both so much for giving me the numbers. I still don't want to accept them. You have led the horse to water. I still need to drink.

Mom's Spaghetti

Posts: 1,774

Date of registration
: May 10th 2014

Platform: 360

Location: United States, Pennsylvania

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 6

Tuesday, May 5th 2015, 2:31pm

### Quoted

No PS3 people either? I think ARE5R06, AmmuNOPE and I are possibly the only ones.

And even they are not too consistent.

You and I are really the only active old gen-ers

Symthic's Friendly Neighborhood Pastafarian

Master of nothing, mediocre at everything... except dropping ammo boxes. I do that like it's my fucking job.
BAND RECOMMENDATION OF THE WEEK (or really till whenever I update it): I don't really have much if I'm being honest. Give me some metalcore recommendations and I'll try 'em out

### Quoted from "3VerstsNorth"

No, but i am into immature jokes about sexual intercourse with cats with a pinch of stereotypical asian accent.

Thanks razal.

### Quoted from "hunturk"

I don't even have a big neck.

I didn't know vertigo could disrupt one's sense of size.

Can't get a title

Posts: 1,530

Date of registration
: Dec 23rd 2013

Platform: Xbox One

Location: The Land of Multitudinous Kangaroos

Reputation modifier: 12

Tuesday, May 5th 2015, 3:49pm

### Quoted

No PS3 people either? I think ARE5R06, AmmuNOPE and I are possibly the only ones.

And even they are not too consistent.

You and I are really the only active old gen-ers

Yeah, it's a shame there's not more Symthic people

I'm not likely to move off old gen any time soon due to me being a leader of a 130+ person BF4 platoon, half of which are on old gen.

Oh well, I've kinda gotten used to the lower player count now.
something something Model 8 bestgun

### Quoted from "Pastafarianism"

Next, wanna try adding a guy that you KNOW is bad, and just testing to see that? Example: PP-2000 (god I so wanna love this gun, and yet...)

### Quoted from "Pastafarianism"

Example: PP-2000 (god I so wanna love this gun, and yet...)

Yes, it comes in last so far, but that is mostly because I'm making it shoot at 100m ADS - Not Moving as one of the criteria. Even then, between 50-100m Not Moving, when you include Useability, it is only 1.37% worse than the MTAR-21. Within 50m then it even beats the A-91.

Have a look, vs. the A-91 Carbine:

Using it with Muzzle Brake and Compensator is a wash in terms of overall performance. Comp is SLIGHTLY more accurate, while MB is SLIGHTLY more easy to use. Their overall scores are basically tied, with MB just ahead. I guess either can be recommended.

### Quoted from "Pastafarianism"

But... You can't be counting for the fact that it takes 9 bullets to kill at "long" range... Don't you dare tell me my A-91 is worse than a 9 BTK 650 RPM mediocre PDW.

Also. Just go heavy barrel. The recoil is low enough.

### Quoted from "Zer0Cod3x"

Well, technically...

Comparing a PP2K with HB and an A-91 with comp and stubby (as you suggested in an earlier post), at 50m not moving, the A-91 is only better by 4 damage per hitrate. While at 75m and 100m, surprisingly the PP2K does better than the A-91 (I'm pretty damn surprised as well).

And 10m and 50m moving the PP2K also does more damage per hitrate than the A-91. At 25m the A-91 is only better by about half a bullet's damage as well.

In addition, the PP2K has a much larger mag size and substantially less recoil. And it looks hella awesome. So comparing the A-91 to a PDW is of some worth after all, as the PP2K is better (technically, not practically) than the A-91.

Mind blown.

### Quoted from "Pastafarianism"

I... I...

*cries in a corner*

### Quoted from "Veritable"

Zer0Cod3x explained it very well. If you look at the raw numbers right here on Symthic Comparison, you can see how that happened:

A-91 vs PP-2000 | BF4 Weapon Comparison | Symthic

A-91's "23%" RPM advantage only afforded it 1 extra round.

Velocities are wash.

V-Recoil are wash (and this is HBar on PP2k vs. A-91 without).

Hipfire and ADS - Moving are better on the PP2k, but it's a PDW and not the surprising part.

The surprising part is that, as equipped (and we see above that PP2k HBar has almost same V-Recoil as A-91 without HBar so why not?), the PDW performs better at 50 - 100m than a bloody Carbine. Why?

SIPS, 42% better on the PP2k.

And here is the most important part. ADS - Not Moving Spread, 0.35 vs. 0.2, 43% improvement.

Without HBar then of course the PP2k loses, which is why when I add all the attachments together for an Overall Ranking, it would slot below the A-91. Run HBar on it, though, then... I'm sorry

### Quoted from "Pastafarianism"

@Veritable
@Zer0Cod3x
I... I...
But...
Wha...
I AM HAVING AN EXISTENTIAL CRISIS IN SCHOOL BECAUSE OF YOU TWO.

FUCK YOU NERDS AND YOUR FANCY NUMBERS

SEXY RUSSIAN BULLPUPS FTW.

In all seriousness, thank you both so much for giving me the numbers. I still don't want to accept them. You have led the horse to water. I still need to drink.

Mom's Spaghetti

Posts: 1,774

Date of registration
: May 10th 2014

Platform: 360

Location: United States, Pennsylvania

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 6

Tuesday, May 5th 2015, 3:58pm

### Quoted

No PS3 people either? I think ARE5R06, AmmuNOPE and I are possibly the only ones.

And even they are not too consistent.

You and I are really the only active old gen-ers

Yeah, it's a shame there's not more Symthic people

I'm not likely to move off old gen any time soon due to me being a leader of a 130+ person BF4 platoon, half of which are on old gen.

Oh well, I've kinda gotten used to the lower player count now.

I need to move off. I can't stand 30 FPS anymore. I also need more than 24 players.

Go on my Battlelog. Notice how little Conquest I play? I CAN'T STAND LACK OF PEOPLE. It's why I play Rush. It's more condensed, and yet I still get some longer range and vehicle action.

I would LOOOOVE Conquest if I could have at LEAST 32 people. Preferably 48, or even 64.

Symthic's Friendly Neighborhood Pastafarian

Master of nothing, mediocre at everything... except dropping ammo boxes. I do that like it's my fucking job.
BAND RECOMMENDATION OF THE WEEK (or really till whenever I update it): I don't really have much if I'm being honest. Give me some metalcore recommendations and I'll try 'em out

### Quoted from "3VerstsNorth"

No, but i am into immature jokes about sexual intercourse with cats with a pinch of stereotypical asian accent.

Thanks razal.

### Quoted from "hunturk"

I don't even have a big neck.

I didn't know vertigo could disrupt one's sense of size.

Can't get a title

Posts: 1,530

Date of registration
: Dec 23rd 2013

Platform: Xbox One

Location: The Land of Multitudinous Kangaroos

Reputation modifier: 12

Tuesday, May 5th 2015, 4:14pm

### Quoted

No PS3 people either? I think ARE5R06, AmmuNOPE and I are possibly the only ones.

And even they are not too consistent.

You and I are really the only active old gen-ers

Yeah, it's a shame there's not more Symthic people

I'm not likely to move off old gen any time soon due to me being a leader of a 130+ person BF4 platoon, half of which are on old gen.

Oh well, I've kinda gotten used to the lower player count now.

I need to move off. I can't stand 30 FPS anymore. I also need more than 24 players.

Go on my Battlelog. Notice how little Conquest I play? I CAN'T STAND LACK OF PEOPLE. It's why I play Rush. It's more condensed, and yet I still get some longer range and vehicle action.

I would LOOOOVE Conquest if I could have at LEAST 32 people. Preferably 48, or even 64.

Exactly the same here, my main gamemode is Rush. And if I play Conquest it's generally DT or 24/7 OP Locker/Metro.

Although if you know where to go and how to play each Conquest map you can generally get at least 15-20 or so kills per vanilla Conquest game.
something something Model 8 bestgun

### Quoted from "Pastafarianism"

Next, wanna try adding a guy that you KNOW is bad, and just testing to see that? Example: PP-2000 (god I so wanna love this gun, and yet...)

### Quoted from "Pastafarianism"

Example: PP-2000 (god I so wanna love this gun, and yet...)

Yes, it comes in last so far, but that is mostly because I'm making it shoot at 100m ADS - Not Moving as one of the criteria. Even then, between 50-100m Not Moving, when you include Useability, it is only 1.37% worse than the MTAR-21. Within 50m then it even beats the A-91.

Have a look, vs. the A-91 Carbine:

Using it with Muzzle Brake and Compensator is a wash in terms of overall performance. Comp is SLIGHTLY more accurate, while MB is SLIGHTLY more easy to use. Their overall scores are basically tied, with MB just ahead. I guess either can be recommended.

### Quoted from "Pastafarianism"

But... You can't be counting for the fact that it takes 9 bullets to kill at "long" range... Don't you dare tell me my A-91 is worse than a 9 BTK 650 RPM mediocre PDW.

Also. Just go heavy barrel. The recoil is low enough.

### Quoted from "Zer0Cod3x"

Well, technically...

Comparing a PP2K with HB and an A-91 with comp and stubby (as you suggested in an earlier post), at 50m not moving, the A-91 is only better by 4 damage per hitrate. While at 75m and 100m, surprisingly the PP2K does better than the A-91 (I'm pretty damn surprised as well).

And 10m and 50m moving the PP2K also does more damage per hitrate than the A-91. At 25m the A-91 is only better by about half a bullet's damage as well.

In addition, the PP2K has a much larger mag size and substantially less recoil. And it looks hella awesome. So comparing the A-91 to a PDW is of some worth after all, as the PP2K is better (technically, not practically) than the A-91.

Mind blown.

### Quoted from "Pastafarianism"

I... I...

*cries in a corner*

### Quoted from "Veritable"

Zer0Cod3x explained it very well. If you look at the raw numbers right here on Symthic Comparison, you can see how that happened:

A-91 vs PP-2000 | BF4 Weapon Comparison | Symthic

A-91's "23%" RPM advantage only afforded it 1 extra round.

Velocities are wash.

V-Recoil are wash (and this is HBar on PP2k vs. A-91 without).

Hipfire and ADS - Moving are better on the PP2k, but it's a PDW and not the surprising part.

The surprising part is that, as equipped (and we see above that PP2k HBar has almost same V-Recoil as A-91 without HBar so why not?), the PDW performs better at 50 - 100m than a bloody Carbine. Why?

SIPS, 42% better on the PP2k.

And here is the most important part. ADS - Not Moving Spread, 0.35 vs. 0.2, 43% improvement.

Without HBar then of course the PP2k loses, which is why when I add all the attachments together for an Overall Ranking, it would slot below the A-91. Run HBar on it, though, then... I'm sorry

### Quoted from "Pastafarianism"

@Veritable
@Zer0Cod3x
I... I...
But...
Wha...
I AM HAVING AN EXISTENTIAL CRISIS IN SCHOOL BECAUSE OF YOU TWO.

FUCK YOU NERDS AND YOUR FANCY NUMBERS

SEXY RUSSIAN BULLPUPS FTW.

In all seriousness, thank you both so much for giving me the numbers. I still don't want to accept them. You have led the horse to water. I still need to drink.

Suidae cathexis

Posts: 9,731

Date of registration
: Jul 1st 2012

Platform: PC

Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 20

Tuesday, May 5th 2015, 4:24pm

### Quoted from "Zer0Cod3x"

Exactly the same here, my main gamemode is Rush. And if I play Conquest it's generally DT or 24/7 OP Locker/Metro.

Probably best if you stay on console then

Everybody's Favourite Worthless Support and LMG Fan!

Song currently stuck in my head is: Somewhere Beyond Seas by Varathron!

Mom's Spaghetti

Posts: 1,774

Date of registration
: May 10th 2014

Platform: 360

Location: United States, Pennsylvania

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 6

Tuesday, May 5th 2015, 4:25pm

### Quoted

I need to move off. I can't stand 30 FPS anymore. I also need more than 24 players.

Go on my Battlelog. Notice how little Conquest I play? I CAN'T STAND LACK OF PEOPLE. It's why I play Rush. It's more condensed, and yet I still get some longer range and vehicle action.

I would LOOOOVE Conquest if I could have at LEAST 32 people. Preferably 48, or even 64.

Exactly the same here, my main gamemode is Rush. And if I play Conquest it's generally DT or 24/7 OP Locker/Metro.

Although if you know where to go and how to play each Conquest map you can generally get at least 15-20 or so kills per vanilla Conquest game.

Same. Go Locker or go Rush

And 15-20 is accurate, maybe less if infantry only, more if armor only. In comparison, I get about 10 MINIMUM (and that's when screwing around) and can get as much as 50, normally about 20.

About the same number right? Yea, but Rush is a shorter gamemode.
Edit: I fucked up the quote so many times...
Fuck Tapatalk

Symthic's Friendly Neighborhood Pastafarian

Master of nothing, mediocre at everything... except dropping ammo boxes. I do that like it's my fucking job.
BAND RECOMMENDATION OF THE WEEK (or really till whenever I update it): I don't really have much if I'm being honest. Give me some metalcore recommendations and I'll try 'em out

### Quoted from "3VerstsNorth"

No, but i am into immature jokes about sexual intercourse with cats with a pinch of stereotypical asian accent.

Thanks razal.

### Quoted from "hunturk"

I don't even have a big neck.

I didn't know vertigo could disrupt one's sense of size.

Cannot into Rankine

Posts: 1,234

Date of registration
: Dec 19th 2013

Platform: PC

Location: 45.4000° N, 75.6667° W

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 8

Tuesday, May 5th 2015, 9:42pm

### Quoted from "Pastafarianism"

I can't stand 30 FPS anymore.

Then why even consider staying with consoles?,

$400(consoles) +($50 *4[years}) = 600 save a little more if you like for a PC.
Apparently we do have a facebook... You should go ahead and like it

If only people would talk back it wouldn't be so lonely.[In B4 I get overwhelmed]

"Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish." - Euripides, Bacchae

"You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant."- Harlan Ellison

### Quoted from "LeGarcon"

Hardline is a fun and sometimes silly Cops and Robbers sorta thing and I think that's great. Or it would be if it didn't suck.

### Quoted from "Rezal"

intel best ethernet controllers

ammo regen pls

### Quoted from "tehmoriz"

TL;DR: all vehicles in BF4 are screwed up in some way or another.

### Quoted from "Aenonar"

I know I shouldn't be surprised that something like that even exists but....

### Quoted from "NoctyrneSAGA"

Posts: 30

Date of registration
: Mar 2nd 2014

Platform: PC

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 3

Saturday, May 23rd 2015, 4:07am

I applied to the community platoon. I mostly lurk but I do post from time to time as well, hope that's acceptable. Battlelog name at this time is: DrunkenAstronaut

Posts: 39

Date of registration
: Mar 1st 2015

Platform: PC

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 1

Sunday, May 24th 2015, 12:58am

I would also like to apply,

My Battlelog name is EnigmaVoidX

Sraw Master Race (Y)

Well hopefully spring patch don't ruin that

4 guests