Quoted from "Miffyli"

Woo~. M1907 Trench is even better as you don't have to aim to be (relatively) accurate .
Rep++.

Absolutely! - I didn't include all the variants because many of them are similar to hitrater in a vacuum.

Is this data available for armor as well?

I'd be pretty curious to see where tankers are getting their kills, especially relative to BF4.

Quoted from "Miffyli"

(BF1 kills, kills done with vehicles only)

I assume this doesn't include planes...just wanted to check. This shows why Assault is such a struggle vs. armor - short range weapons vs. long range armor and its support team. Bless the Ribeyrolles!

Quoted from "InterimAegis"

Quoted from "Miffyli"

(BF1 kills, kills done with vehicles only)

I assume this doesn't include planes...just wanted to check. This shows why Assault is such a struggle vs. armor - short range weapons vs. long range armor and its support team. Bless the Ribeyrolles!

The median is a pathetic 41 m. That's basically danger close for a tank in BF.

Quoted

Quoted

Quoted

(BF1 kills, kills done with vehicles only)

I assume this doesn't include planes...just wanted to check. This shows why Assault is such a struggle vs. armor - short range weapons vs. long range armor and its support team. Bless the Ribeyrolles!

The median is a pathetic 41 m. That's basically danger close for a tank in BF.

I believe it is a danger for tanks in the previous title. With rockets are less restrict to fire and general infantry's anti-armor weaponry have a longer impactful touch to the armor. In BF1 though, dynamite and limpet are purely useful at under 20 M. AT nade isn't that good at 20+M either, since it is impossible to let most pub players hit 40M nade throw every time. Then we come to the rocket gun. Yes, it is good at the middle~long range for AT staff. But the restriction is much. And the angle while you are pruning might be a really bad thing for even hitting a damn thing. So I think the danger zone for tank in BF1 is probably around 20~30. 40 is fairly speaking safe for tank.

Quoted from "Quantage"

Quoted

Quoted

Quoted

(BF1 kills, kills done with vehicles only)

I assume this doesn't include planes...just wanted to check. This shows why Assault is such a struggle vs. armor - short range weapons vs. long range armor and its support team. Bless the Ribeyrolles!

The median is a pathetic 41 m. That's basically danger close for a tank in BF.

I believe it is a danger for tanks in the previous title. With rockets are less restrict to fire and general infantry's anti-armor weaponry have a longer impactful touch to the armor. In BF1 though, dynamite and limpet are purely useful at under 20 M. AT nade isn't that good at 20+M either, since it is impossible to let most pub players hit 40M nade throw every time. Then we come to the rocket gun. Yes, it is good at the middle~long range for AT staff. But the restriction is much. And the angle while you are pruning might be a really bad thing for even hitting a damn thing. So I think the danger zone for tank in BF1 is probably around 20~30. 40 is fairly speaking safe for tank.

You try to fart around 40 m from a killzone and not end up with squishies creeping up your flanks. People basically sprint as fast as the tanks can move too.

Rocket gun is basically 100% accurate <40 m unless bad, too.

Yeah... I wasn't a good tanker... when I was going around as infantry. Tank at 20-30 was much more killable than at 40M for me personally. probably due to the fact that I run dynamic more than AT Gun. the nade has a better chance to hit at 20~30 to deal consistent damage and AT gun is probably much stronger while multiple people shooting at once....

Quoted from "Quantage"

Yeah... I wasn't a good tanker... when I was going around as infantry. Tank at 20-30 was much more killable than at 40M for me personally. probably due to the fact that I run dynamic more than AT Gun. the nade has a better chance to hit at 20~30 to deal consistent damage and AT gun is probably much stronger while multiple people shooting at once....

IMO the overall intent with tank vs AT balance was a squad vs vehicle, and is reflected by the burst damage/total output of a single player per magazine.

The rocket gun is practically as good as the HE cannons, just attached to a squishy platform.