Symthic Forum was shut down on January 11th, 2019. You're viewing an archive of this page from 2019-01-08 at 22:57. Thank you all for your support! Please get in touch via the Curse help desk if you need any support using this archive.
If it flies, it diesÂ.
The problem with the breakthrough is that the main gun sucks vs infantry so you need those autocannons operational.
Really? The Case Cannon cannot be that poor of a choice against enemy infantry.
This post has been edited 2 times, last edit by "Speccu" (Nov 25th 2016, 1:55am)
Perhaps a change to how the A7V handles rough terrain could help make the landship more attractive as an option?
irl the A7V was much worse at navigating trenches than either the Mark V or the FT due to its skirt around the tracks and its overall low ground clearance.
Perhaps a change to how the A7V handles rough terrain could help make the landship more attractive as an option?
irl the A7V was much worse at navigating trenches than either the Mark V or the FT due to its skirt around the tracks and its overall low ground clearance.
Yeah, having a skirt and being top-heavy were problems for it. It should definitely be the least mobile of the three, being the tanky tank. Landship should be best over terrain, with the FT being the most nimble.
If it flies, it diesÂ.
Date of registration
: May 30th 2012
Platform: PS4
Location: SURROUNDED BY FUCKING MOUNTAINS
Reputation modifier: 20
Quoted from "MsMuchLove"
I find majority of the complaints I hear about this game somehow never appear in my games.
FT is very useful on Amiens, the problem is that it is made of paper and will invariably run into a tank that isn't an FT and it will lose since it lacks the speed to flee. You cannot pull down the main two roads fast enough and reverse into an alley before you die to cannon fire.Perhaps a change to how the A7V handles rough terrain could help make the landship more attractive as an option?
irl the A7V was much worse at navigating trenches than either the Mark V or the FT due to its skirt around the tracks and its overall low ground clearance.
Yeah, having a skirt and being top-heavy were problems for it. It should definitely be the least mobile of the three, being the tanky tank. Landship should be best over terrain, with the FT being the most nimble.
Yes I agree with those ideas.
I do also think a part of it is Dice's map design doesn't really support different tanks for different roles. One would think there would be more FT's in Amiens for example, with its narrow alleys and and the FT's size, speed, and turret allowing it to quickly adapt to changing battlefield conditions, but in practice most players simply pick the A7V and park it on or around the bridges.
A lot of the maps lack terrain that is impassable for the A7V, either by being too rough or too narrow, and there is a lack of cover in a lot of the maps where the FT could hide behind with only its turret peeking over.
DICE should really pay more attention to how World of Tanks maps are designed in the future.
Forum Software: Burning Board®, developed by WoltLab® GmbH
© Design by Symthic.com