Welcome to symthic forums! We would love if you'd register!
You don't have to be expert in bit baking, everyone is more than welcome to join our community.

You are not logged in.

Hey! If this is your first visit on symthic.com, also check out our weapon damage charts.
Currently we have charts for Battlefield 3, Call of Duty: Black Ops 2, Medal of Honor: Warfighter and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

Posts: 7,748

Date of registration
: Feb 25th 2012

Platform: PC

Location: italy

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 19

  • Send private message

11

Monday, January 30th 2017, 4:19am

dropped the mouse sensitivity to 1500dpi

what mouse do you have? in my case of the g502, a lower dpi is only worse, you should always lower the in-game sensitivity rather than dpi if you can, especially when talking about medium and long range.

at the moment i use 5500 dpi, before i used 2000, while difference is incredibily minimal(at least compared to 800-1500) i still can feel a higher accuracy, naturally i converted the sensitivity based on dpi using calculators. higher dpi=less pixels per minimum amount of movement or whatever they're actually talked.
if sensitivity is the same, moving the mouse 1 centimeter will always move the same total distance on screen whatever the dpi, however during my tests, it appeared to move in steps(the aiming point) so if it would take 3 "steps" or "ticks" or whatever to move from point A to point be in a centimeter with 500 dpi, it would take 8 steps with 1500 dpi.

afaik this adds some delay, but were talking like single-digits numbers of milliseconds on high-end mices, if you have a cheap mouse low sens+low dpi might wokr well though, but i prefer high dpi-low sens(about 8 centimeters for a 360 iirc)
"I'm just a loot whore."


stuff mostly unrelated to BF4 that interests nobody



bf4
on 13/05/2016
23rd M320FB user on pc(13/05/16)
rush mode score RANK:2794 TOP:2% OUT OF:215398
obliteration mode scoreRANK:994 TOP:1% OUT OF:159466
handgun medals RANK:2236 TOP:2% OUT OF:143874
longest headshot RANK:9512 TOP:4% OUT OF:257589
recon score RANK:10871 TOP:4% OUT OF:274899
general score per minute RANK:10016 TOP:4% OUT OF:294774

bf3
31/3/2012 4:58:

Headshot distance RANK:493* TOP:0%
Revives per assault minute RANK: 6019 TOP: 3%
Headshots / kill percentage RANK:25947 TOP:13%
MVP ribbons RANK:18824 TOP:11%

*= 6 if we not count the EOD BOT headshots

@kataklism

ARGUMENT DESTROYED 100

ENEMY KILLED [REASON] JSLICE20 100


WRITING SPREE STOPPED 500

link to full-size old avatar:
http://i.imgur.com/4X0321O.gif




Gecko99

thank mr skeltal

(409)

Posts: 192

Date of registration
: Dec 17th 2016

Platform: PC

Location: Kauai

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 2

  • Send private message

12

Monday, January 30th 2017, 4:30am

I know it probably makes me casual degenerate scum, but I really love the .25 :(


Liking Model 8 .25 = ban

@elementofprgress enforce this please
I really should abandon it for the factory version but I think going from 0.51 Hrecoil to 0.81 Hrecoil is going to be more difficult than adapting to the 5 round mag.
Autoloading 8 .25 extended user.

Posts: 3,293

Date of registration
: Mar 19th 2014

Platform: Xbox One

Location: Canada

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 14

  • Send private message

13

Monday, January 30th 2017, 4:37am

I really should abandon it for the factory version but I think going from 0.51 Hrecoil to 0.81 Hrecoil is going to be more difficult than adapting to the 5 round mag.


Using it at a flat 1x zoom, you really don't feel any recoil at all, in my experience.
Who has fun, wins.

Zer0Cod3x

Can't get a title

(1,327)

Posts: 1,528

Date of registration
: Dec 23rd 2013

Platform: Xbox One

Location: The Land of Multitudinous Kangaroos

Reputation modifier: 12

  • Send private message

14

Monday, January 30th 2017, 4:58am

i mean when are you ever going to use just 5 bullets for a person? you need at least 10 or you can't kill anything with it, and that spread man, especially the hipfire.

Well, I didn't mean insult the weapon itself, you sick bastard :P
something something Model 8 bestgun


How to ice an A-91

Next, wanna try adding a guy that you KNOW is bad, and just testing to see that? Example: PP-2000 (god I so wanna love this gun, and yet...)

Example: PP-2000 (god I so wanna love this gun, and yet...)

PP-2000 added. Y'know, it's not that bad....

Yes, it comes in last so far, but that is mostly because I'm making it shoot at 100m ADS - Not Moving as one of the criteria. Even then, between 50-100m Not Moving, when you include Useability, it is only 1.37% worse than the MTAR-21. Within 50m then it even beats the A-91.

Have a look, vs. the A-91 Carbine:




Using it with Muzzle Brake and Compensator is a wash in terms of overall performance. Comp is SLIGHTLY more accurate, while MB is SLIGHTLY more easy to use. Their overall scores are basically tied, with MB just ahead. I guess either can be recommended.

But... You can't be counting for the fact that it takes 9 bullets to kill at "long" range... Don't you dare tell me my A-91 is worse than a 9 BTK 650 RPM mediocre PDW.

Also. Just go heavy barrel. The recoil is low enough.

Well, technically...

Comparing a PP2K with HB and an A-91 with comp and stubby (as you suggested in an earlier post), at 50m not moving, the A-91 is only better by 4 damage per hitrate. While at 75m and 100m, surprisingly the PP2K does better than the A-91 (I'm pretty damn surprised as well).

And 10m and 50m moving the PP2K also does more damage per hitrate than the A-91. At 25m the A-91 is only better by about half a bullet's damage as well.

In addition, the PP2K has a much larger mag size and substantially less recoil. And it looks hella awesome. So comparing the A-91 to a PDW is of some worth after all, as the PP2K is better (technically, not practically) than the A-91.

Mind blown.

I... I...

*cries in a corner*

Zer0Cod3x explained it very well. If you look at the raw numbers right here on Symthic Comparison, you can see how that happened:

A-91 vs PP-2000 | BF4 Weapon Comparison | Symthic

A-91's "23%" RPM advantage only afforded it 1 extra round.

Reload times are wash.

Velocities are wash.

V-Recoil are wash (and this is HBar on PP2k vs. A-91 without).

Hipfire and ADS - Moving are better on the PP2k, but it's a PDW and not the surprising part.

The surprising part is that, as equipped (and we see above that PP2k HBar has almost same V-Recoil as A-91 without HBar so why not?), the PDW performs better at 50 - 100m than a bloody Carbine. Why?

H-Recoil Spread, 0.525 vs. 0.45, advantage PP2k.

SIPS, 42% better on the PP2k.

And here is the most important part. ADS - Not Moving Spread, 0.35 vs. 0.2, 43% improvement.

Without HBar then of course the PP2k loses, which is why when I add all the attachments together for an Overall Ranking, it would slot below the A-91. Run HBar on it, though, then... I'm sorry

@Veritable
@Zer0Cod3x
I... I...
But...
Wha...
I AM HAVING AN EXISTENTIAL CRISIS IN SCHOOL BECAUSE OF YOU TWO.

FUCK YOU NERDS AND YOUR FANCY NUMBERS

SEXY RUSSIAN BULLPUPS FTW.

In all seriousness, thank you both so much for giving me the numbers. I still don't want to accept them. You have led the horse to water. I still need to drink.


Posts: 820

Date of registration
: Dec 8th 2013

Platform: PC

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 12

  • Send private message

15

Monday, January 30th 2017, 4:59am

Auto-8 .35 vs. Luger 1906, performance differences (so not strictly in the stats sense) that I've noticed:

Single Bullet Reload, Auto-8 @ 2.45s > Luger @ 2.88s.

Stripper Clip (Full) Reload, Luger @ 2.8s > Auto-8 @ 3.217s.

Hipfire, not simply from the listed Spread values that Auto-8 > Luger, but also the higher max damage AND higher RoF make it way more feasible.

Sights - well, the Factory versions for both can use the same Buckhorn sight, so can be no difference there... however, the Auto-8 has access to a Marksman version that comes with the better ADS - Moving spread as below, AND buffed SIPS.

ADS - Moving, I have Auto-8 Marksman @ 0.38375 > Luger @ 0.4125 > Auto-8 Factory @ 0.4275.

Velocity, Luger > Auto-8, and the 12.5% advantage REALLY helps... hence my higher Accuracy with the 1906 despite being forced to use Irons, due to not having to worry about bullet drop / deflection nearly as much.

"Luger Man," where you can pair the 1906 with the P08, while the Auto-8 does not have an obvious pairing... so on that front, Luger > Auto-8.

Posts: 3,293

Date of registration
: Mar 19th 2014

Platform: Xbox One

Location: Canada

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 14

  • Send private message

16

Monday, January 30th 2017, 5:14am

"Luger Man," where you can pair the 1906 with the P08, while the Auto-8 does not have an obvious pairing... so on that front, Luger > Auto-8.


Anything else designed by John Browning, and we have a lot of those: Auto-5, Model 8, BAR, 1903 Hammerless, Mle 1903, and M1911, off the top of my head. And it just so happens that the Model 8 and Mle 1903 is a fantastic combo.
Who has fun, wins.

marbleduck

Smoked Salmon Best Salmon

(1,488)

  • "marbleduck" started this thread

Posts: 1,020

Date of registration
: Dec 25th 2012

Platform: PC

Location: Yakima. WA

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 12

  • Send private message

17

Monday, January 30th 2017, 5:46am

"Luger Man," where you can pair the 1906 with the P08, while the Auto-8 does not have an obvious pairing... so on that front, Luger > Auto-8.


Anything else designed by John Browning, and we have a lot of those: Auto-5, Model 8, BAR, 1903 Hammerless, Mle 1903, and M1911, off the top of my head. And it just so happens that the Model 8 and Mle 1903 is a fantastic combo.


Once you go 450ms you never go back.

Platoon Marble Duck

Hate Mail

"you obviously don't know what an argument is as there is only one person battling. Do you really fucking think I want subs? You think you can act all big and powerful just because you sit on a computer at least 6 hours a day like the probably nerdy unwanted retard you are with 4.3k subs? You think 4.3k subs is a lot? LOL you need medicine man. I don't want any subs as i just have a google account for other media and writing comments. Think twice before you act. You even said in your video you aren't that great of a player, and the comments agree you aren't. Maybe you should once again think twice before you act, stop being such an annoying, ignorant bastard that everyone wants to shut up, and god, literally, just shut up. Your voice gave me a headache :s"

"As a youtuber shouldn't be trying to be reeling in your viewers with exciting stuff being said not your boring ass commentary for your video"

"The more you watch his vid the dumber he gets I swear he's borderline autistic look I got shot behind cover beacuase thin sheets metal are unpenetrable. Bf4 is just as quiet and tactical as bf3 random explosion in the background . Player has dissconected from chat
You started playing bf3 and never touched bfc1/2. Please do yourself a favor and shutdown your generic cod channel down"

"Nice clickb8 Faggot w8ting for your shit tier video to disable comments . Fucking newfag cancer go play some cod you activisiom cock faggot"

"I don't see why he [MarbleDuck] always tries to shit on levelcap he is better and has a million more subs...and also "there isnt a best gun in she game there are guns that are better that others at different engagement distances" yes thats true and whichever is the best/most average at all of them is the "best gun""

"Marbleduck you don't know shit lol levelcap knows more than you do you cant talk about how someone puts up garbage when you do yourself your a newcomer to YouTube acting like you know shit step up in the food chain first then you have the right to talk otherwise your just a fish trying to compete with sharks"

"Why don't we just witness "LevelCap vs MarbleDuck" One on One both on Battlefield 3 and Battlefield 4 seen as there is so much Controversy about the Two Youtubers"

"stfu cunt, BF3 was way better end of discussion"

"Stfu man, you're be littleing the most looked upon Battlefield Youtuber. No one cares about you, how much of an ego you have, or quite frankly your opinion. It's a fucking game.... Does it really fucking matter? Pathetic man."

"fuck you asshole, dont talk shit about total"

"Wtf is your problem? You have no subs and he has millions, yet you pick on him like some kind of stubborn, ignorant, rude child born with a silver spoon is his mouth. It's easy to do that, for example... You said there was no background noise yet there is. You say you're a fairly good player, you're not."

"please talk like a normal person and not like a professional"

Posts: 3,293

Date of registration
: Mar 19th 2014

Platform: Xbox One

Location: Canada

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 14

  • Send private message

18

Monday, January 30th 2017, 6:02am

Relevant because of your recent video: What's your reasoning for using the C93? Specifically vs the Mle in one direction, and Taschenpistole in the other direction; the slightly higher velocity seems like about the only thing going for it.
Who has fun, wins.

Posts: 221

Date of registration
: Oct 30th 2014

Platform: PC

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 6

  • Send private message

19

Monday, January 30th 2017, 6:03am

You use Auto 8 and Borschard.
Both have the same RPM.

Posts: 3,293

Date of registration
: Mar 19th 2014

Platform: Xbox One

Location: Canada

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 14

  • Send private message

20

Monday, January 30th 2017, 6:52am

You use Auto 8 and Borschard.
Both have the same RPM.


Mle 1903 also has 360rpm, I'm curious as to why he (or you) prefers the C93.

Also, the C93 has the same damage model as the faster 450rpm pocket pistols, so really the C93 is a slow-firing pocket pistol with better velocity. But while higher velocity is nice for consistency, is it really worth losing that much RoF for it? if you're going to sacrifice RoF, might as well use the Mle 1903, no?
Who has fun, wins.