Welcome to symthic forums! We would love if you'd register!
You don't have to be expert in bit baking, everyone is more than welcome to join our community.

You are not logged in.

Posts: 210

Date of registration
: Dec 21st 2016

Platform: Xbox One

Location: Spokane, WA, USA

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 3

  • Send private message

41

Sunday, February 5th 2017, 11:57pm

If there was a BAR with a bipod and a 40rd mag, there'd be little reason to use anything else. A Low Weight BAR (irons and bipod) would be similarly OP.

A bipod on the Saltblaster 1916 marksman would get obnoxious as well.


Stuff like this is reason for the restrictivness of the variant system, IMO.
I dont see how a low weight BAR would be OP, It would be just as fair and balanced as all the other variants. I dont see how an optical selbstlader 1906 would be obnoxious. It has 20% of the mag size of the m1916 with the trade off of better performance
Official heretic of the Symthic forums. Avid M1907 factory user and complete casual pleb.
Iplaysgames96 - Profile Overview - Battlefield 1 Tracker

Posts: 3,630

Date of registration
: Mar 19th 2014

Platform: Xbox One

Location: Canada

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 16

  • Send private message

42

Monday, February 6th 2017, 12:45am

BAR LW would be not too different from the Storm or Trench, but would get a Bipod, that's the real issue. Right now you have to trade being able to use the BAR to its CQB strengths to get a Bipod, partly because of the big blocky scope that has a rather high magnification no matter what.

Optical Luger would be bad for the same reason we don't have an Optical Rem .35: It would be too good. The Luger is a very range-focused option anyway, its intended Marksman and Sniper variants would be far better.
Who Enjoys, Wins