Symthic Forum was shut down on January 11th, 2019. You're viewing an archive of this page from 2019-01-08 at 22:54. Thank you all for your support! Please get in touch via the Curse help desk if you need any support using this archive.

Welcome to symthic forums! We would love if you'd register!
You don't have to be expert in bit baking, everyone is more than welcome to join our community.

You are not logged in.

## Vehicle stats

Posts: 18

Date of registration
: Sep 12th 2012

Platform: PC

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 5

Friday, December 2nd 2016, 5:18am

### Vehicle stats

Game has been out for over a month now. Are we ever going to get vehicle weapon stats? In general, tanks, planes, stationaries, etc...

Symthic Developer

Posts: 3,750

Date of registration
: Mar 21st 2013

Platform: PC

Location: __main__, Finland

Reputation modifier: 17

Friday, December 2nd 2016, 6:46am

Vehicle stats require damage multipliers and good bunch of manual parsing before we can add them to the site, and for now damage multipliers are unknown. It took quite long for BF4 to get these up as well, and BF1 even has bunch of new mechanics (e.g. ricochet hit, small destroyable parts) which need their own tinkering.
• 3VerstsNorth - Analysis of game mechanics in BF4 (tickrates, effects of tickrate, etc)
• InterimAegis - Weapon comparisons/scoring.
• leptis - Analysis of shotguns, recoil, recoil control and air drag.
• Veritable - Scoring of BF4/BF1 firearms in terms of usability, firing and other mechanics.
• pmax - Statistical analysis of BF4 players/games.
• Miffyli - Random statistical analysis of BF4 battlereports/players and kill-distances. (list is cluttered with other threads).
Sorry if your name wasn't on the list, I honestly can't recall all names : ( . Nudge me if you want to be included

Posts: 95

Date of registration
: Mar 4th 2016

Platform: PC

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 2

Friday, December 2nd 2016, 11:55am

### Quoted

Vehicle stats require damage multipliers and good bunch of manual parsing before we can add them to the site, and for now damage multipliers are unknown. It took quite long for BF4 to get these up as well, and BF1 even has bunch of new mechanics (e.g. ricochet hit, small destroyable parts) which need their own tinkering.

Posts: 322

Date of registration
: Jun 21st 2012

Platform: PC

Location: Moscow, Russia

Reputation modifier: 9

Friday, December 2nd 2016, 12:23pm

### Quoted

Vehicle stats require damage multipliers and good bunch of manual parsing before we can add them to the site, and for now damage multipliers are unknown. It took quite long for BF4 to get these up as well, and BF1 even has bunch of new mechanics (e.g. ricochet hit, small destroyable parts) which need their own tinkering.

5 damage up close, 1 damage at long, 25 damage to head up close. Very fast ROF and very small recoil.
Sorry for my bad english - it's not my native language and I have difficulties with acquiring speaking/writing practice in my country. If I accidently insult you or say something wrong - I'm sorry, you can feel free to correct me.

Posts: 95

Date of registration
: Mar 4th 2016

Platform: PC

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 2

Friday, December 2nd 2016, 12:36pm

### Quoted

Vehicle stats require damage multipliers and good bunch of manual parsing before we can add them to the site, and for now damage multipliers are unknown. It took quite long for BF4 to get these up as well, and BF1 even has bunch of new mechanics (e.g. ricochet hit, small destroyable parts) which need their own tinkering.

5 damage up close, 1 damage at long, 25 damage to head up close. Very fast ROF and very small recoil.

Yes but I don't see it on Symthics.

Can't get a title

Posts: 1,531

Date of registration
: Dec 23rd 2013

Platform: Xbox One

Location: The Land of Multitudinous Kangaroos

Reputation modifier: 13

Friday, December 2nd 2016, 1:50pm

Kolibri stats:

### Source code

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51

 StartDamage 100.0
EndDamage 20.0
DamageFalloffStartDistance 8.0
DamageFalloffEndDistance 30.0

RateOfFire 449.0

InitialSpeed::Vec3
z 200.0

Stand::GunSwayStandData
NoZoom::GunSwayBaseMoveJumpData
BaseValue::GunSwayDispersionData
MinAngle 0.8
MaxAngle 2.0
IncreasePerShot 0.0125
DecreasePerSecond 3.0
Moving::GunSwayDispersionData
MinAngle 1.2
MaxAngle 2.0
IncreasePerShot 0.0125
DecreasePerSecond 3.0
Zoom::GunSwayBaseMoveJumpData
BaseValue::GunSwayDispersionData
MinAngle 0.4
MaxAngle 1.2
IncreasePerShot 0.0125
DecreasePerSecond 3.0
Moving::GunSwayDispersionData
MinAngle 0.4
MaxAngle 1.2
IncreasePerShot 0.0125
DecreasePerSecond 3.0

Recoil::GunSwayRecoilData
RecoilAmplitudeMax 10.0
RecoilAmplitudeIncPerShot 0.1
HorizontalRecoilAmplitudeIncPerShotMin -0.05
HorizontalRecoilAmplitudeIncPerShotMax 0.05
HorizontalRecoilAmplitudeMax 10.0
RecoilAmplitudeDecreaseFactor 5.0

FirstShotNoZoomDispersionMultiplier 1.0
FirstShotZoomDispersionMultiplier 1.0
FirstShotRecoilMultiplier 1.0

MagazineCapacity 8
NumberOfMagazines 24
something something Model 8 bestgun

### Quoted from "Pastafarianism"

Next, wanna try adding a guy that you KNOW is bad, and just testing to see that? Example: PP-2000 (god I so wanna love this gun, and yet...)

### Quoted from "Pastafarianism"

Example: PP-2000 (god I so wanna love this gun, and yet...)

Yes, it comes in last so far, but that is mostly because I'm making it shoot at 100m ADS - Not Moving as one of the criteria. Even then, between 50-100m Not Moving, when you include Useability, it is only 1.37% worse than the MTAR-21. Within 50m then it even beats the A-91.

Have a look, vs. the A-91 Carbine:

Using it with Muzzle Brake and Compensator is a wash in terms of overall performance. Comp is SLIGHTLY more accurate, while MB is SLIGHTLY more easy to use. Their overall scores are basically tied, with MB just ahead. I guess either can be recommended.

### Quoted from "Pastafarianism"

But... You can't be counting for the fact that it takes 9 bullets to kill at "long" range... Don't you dare tell me my A-91 is worse than a 9 BTK 650 RPM mediocre PDW.

Also. Just go heavy barrel. The recoil is low enough.

### Quoted from "Zer0Cod3x"

Well, technically...

Comparing a PP2K with HB and an A-91 with comp and stubby (as you suggested in an earlier post), at 50m not moving, the A-91 is only better by 4 damage per hitrate. While at 75m and 100m, surprisingly the PP2K does better than the A-91 (I'm pretty damn surprised as well).

And 10m and 50m moving the PP2K also does more damage per hitrate than the A-91. At 25m the A-91 is only better by about half a bullet's damage as well.

In addition, the PP2K has a much larger mag size and substantially less recoil. And it looks hella awesome. So comparing the A-91 to a PDW is of some worth after all, as the PP2K is better (technically, not practically) than the A-91.

Mind blown.

### Quoted from "Pastafarianism"

I... I...

*cries in a corner*

### Quoted from "Veritable"

Zer0Cod3x explained it very well. If you look at the raw numbers right here on Symthic Comparison, you can see how that happened:

A-91 vs PP-2000 | BF4 Weapon Comparison | Symthic

A-91's "23%" RPM advantage only afforded it 1 extra round.

Velocities are wash.

V-Recoil are wash (and this is HBar on PP2k vs. A-91 without).

Hipfire and ADS - Moving are better on the PP2k, but it's a PDW and not the surprising part.

The surprising part is that, as equipped (and we see above that PP2k HBar has almost same V-Recoil as A-91 without HBar so why not?), the PDW performs better at 50 - 100m than a bloody Carbine. Why?

SIPS, 42% better on the PP2k.

And here is the most important part. ADS - Not Moving Spread, 0.35 vs. 0.2, 43% improvement.

Without HBar then of course the PP2k loses, which is why when I add all the attachments together for an Overall Ranking, it would slot below the A-91. Run HBar on it, though, then... I'm sorry

### Quoted from "Pastafarianism"

@Veritable
@Zer0Cod3x
I... I...
But...
Wha...
I AM HAVING AN EXISTENTIAL CRISIS IN SCHOOL BECAUSE OF YOU TWO.

FUCK YOU NERDS AND YOUR FANCY NUMBERS

SEXY RUSSIAN BULLPUPS FTW.

In all seriousness, thank you both so much for giving me the numbers. I still don't want to accept them. You have led the horse to water. I still need to drink.

Symthic Developer

Posts: 3,750

Date of registration
: Mar 21st 2013

Platform: PC

Location: __main__, Finland

Reputation modifier: 17

Friday, December 2nd 2016, 2:11pm

### Quoted

Vehicle stats require damage multipliers and good bunch of manual parsing before we can add them to the site, and for now damage multipliers are unknown. It took quite long for BF4 to get these up as well, and BF1 even has bunch of new mechanics (e.g. ricochet hit, small destroyable parts) which need their own tinkering.

5 damage up close, 1 damage at long, 25 damage to head up close. Very fast ROF and very small recoil.

Yes but I don't see it on Symthics.

You can see the reason on @Zer0Cod3x 's post: It claims damage is 100-20, which clearly is not true. Hence there is a special multiplier for Kolibri we can't obtain from scripts, and thus we can't accurately show Kolibri on site before we get the multiplier.
• 3VerstsNorth - Analysis of game mechanics in BF4 (tickrates, effects of tickrate, etc)
• InterimAegis - Weapon comparisons/scoring.
• leptis - Analysis of shotguns, recoil, recoil control and air drag.
• Veritable - Scoring of BF4/BF1 firearms in terms of usability, firing and other mechanics.
• pmax - Statistical analysis of BF4 players/games.
• Miffyli - Random statistical analysis of BF4 battlereports/players and kill-distances. (list is cluttered with other threads).
Sorry if your name wasn't on the list, I honestly can't recall all names : ( . Nudge me if you want to be included

Posts: 95

Date of registration
: Mar 4th 2016

Platform: PC

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 2

Friday, December 2nd 2016, 2:20pm

Interesting. I feel like Symthic in general has been good for the community and even for the game. Why don't game developers help you out figure those numbers directly instead of having to guess from the game files? What's the point in not giving this information?

I spend nearly as much time watching stats on Symthic than actually playing the game, because I love maths and optimizing my loadouts both with my feeling but also the most mathematically efficient way of killing people. I didn't test all the pistols in the scout class because there's one doing 20+ damage at all range with snipers doing 80-100 damage, so it's not always only a question of feeling. Numbers matter and that's why I love Symthic and Battlefield.

Symthic Developer

Posts: 3,750

Date of registration
: Mar 21st 2013

Platform: PC

Location: __main__, Finland

Reputation modifier: 17

Friday, December 2nd 2016, 2:36pm

### Quoted from "dnLL"

Interesting. I feel like Symthic in general has been good for the community and even for the game. Why don't game developers help you out figure those numbers directly instead of having to guess from the game files? What's the point in not giving this information?

I figure they have to find a good balance between numbers being clear vs. being informative. Understanding all these mechanics would be bit too much for just playing one game. I wouldn't mind accuracy plot style images for each weapon like R6: Siege did though.
• 3VerstsNorth - Analysis of game mechanics in BF4 (tickrates, effects of tickrate, etc)
• InterimAegis - Weapon comparisons/scoring.
• leptis - Analysis of shotguns, recoil, recoil control and air drag.
• Veritable - Scoring of BF4/BF1 firearms in terms of usability, firing and other mechanics.
• pmax - Statistical analysis of BF4 players/games.
• Miffyli - Random statistical analysis of BF4 battlereports/players and kill-distances. (list is cluttered with other threads).
Sorry if your name wasn't on the list, I honestly can't recall all names : ( . Nudge me if you want to be included

Posts: 1,535

Date of registration
: Sep 7th 2016

Platform: PC

Location: Toronto

Battlelog:

Reputation modifier: 5

Friday, December 2nd 2016, 7:00pm

### Quoted from "dnLL"

I didn't test all the pistols in the scout class because there's one doing 20+ damage at all range with snipers doing 80-100 damage, so it's not always only a question of feeling.

So you have only been using the Mars Automatic for the Scout?